|
Quite how AMD's range of Ryzen CPUs would pan out in terms of stock and overclocked performance was anyone's guess, but we're getting a clearer picture of how things stand, at least with the flagship Ryzen 7 range. Today we're looking at the Ryzen 7 1700...
What we have here is somewhat of an overclocker's dream. While anything much over 4GHz is going to be tricky, at least until we see improvements AMD's end, the Ryzen 7 1700 is still able to dish out a 1GHz overclock over its base frequency of 3GHz and thi...
|
|
|
and still features cores, threads of impressive computing power to crunch your multi-threaded workloads It has a base clock frequency of GHz, with a turbo to GHz while preserving a low W TDP (Thermal Design Point, and low power use Unlike the X/X, it d...
65W TDP (Cool running, impressive performance perWatt), 8/16 cores threads, Easy to overclock, Very competitive price, Supplied with RGB LED cooler...
No XFRtechnology, Specific memory requirements...
In our testing, the 1700 performs surprisingly good, and in some benches, better than expected. This is likely down to the ongoing optimisations, and the ironing out of any bugs that may have reared its head since release. There are more optimisations exp...
|
|
|
There was febrile talk of just how the AMD Ryzen processor was going to shake up the enthusiast PC landscape by heralding Intel-matching performance at significantly lower price points. AMD has achieved that aim, as you can see by perusing our R7 1800X an...
8 cores, 16 threads for under £320, Impressive multi-core performance, Lower TDP than 1700X or 1800X, Wide range of modern AM4 boards, Makes Core i7 X99 seem ultra-expensive...
Single-thread is good but not great, Gaming optimisations still needed...
The launch of AMD Ryzen 7 CPUs has largely been greeted with positivity by the media and most forum users. Their undeniable strength rests with massive multi-core capability at prices that are 2-3x cheaper than select Core i7 chips manufactured by Intel...
|
|
|
Ryzen 7 has already proven to be a worthy contender for Intel's LGA 2011-3 set of processors thanks to its similar, or sometimes better, performance levels and significantly cheaper cost. That metric is stretched even further with the 8C16T Ryzen 7 1700 t...
Excellent multi-threaded performance that is vastly superior to that of the Core i7-7700K, Competitive performance against Intel processors three times its price, Up to 3.75GHz XFR frequency helps single-threaded performance, Unlocked CPU multiplier and o...
Gaming performance is not best suited for ultra-high refresh rates and trails i7-7700K levels (outside of GPU-limited scenarios), Lower memory frequency support compared to Kaby Lake...
AMD's Ryzen 7 1700 is perhaps the most interesting chip in the line-up due to its lower price than the 1700X and 1800X, which were superb value in their own right. A new level of multi-threaded performance has been delivered at a £330 price point where In...
|
|
pctechreviews.com.au Updated: 2017-04-08 06:23:28
|
AMD's Ryzen CPU line-up has been one of the most anticipated technology product releases in a long time and yes it has been worth the wait. We were all wondering if Ryzen would stack up to AMD's hype and the collective hope of the community - thankfully...
Solid 8 Core/16 Thread performance, Lower TDP of 65W for cooler operation, Our Sample overclocked to 3.9GHz easily, Suitable for content creation / video editing or render work, New AM4 platform, Very compelling price, Great CPU for a multi-purpose system...
Still slightly slower in some single threaded applications...
Ryzen has been worth the wait. AMD has delivered a solid processor at a disruptive price point. The Ryzen 7 1700 may not have the XFR feature but it's still unlocked and overclocks provided that you have the right motherboard chipset.Power draw and temper...
|
|
|
AMD's Ryzen CPU line-up has been one of the most anticipated technology product releases in a long time and yes it has been worth the wait. We were all wondering if Ryzen would stack up to AMD's hype and the collective hope of the community - thankfully...
Solid 8 Core/16 Thread performance, Lower TDP of 65W for cooler operation, Our Sample overclocked to 3.9GHz easily, Suitable for content creation / video editing or render work, New AM4 platform, Very compelling price, Great CPU for a multi-purpose system...
Still slightly slower in some single threaded applications...
Ryzen has been worth the wait. AMD has delivered a solid processor at a disruptive price point. The Ryzen 7 1700 may not have the XFR feature but it's still unlocked and overclocks provided that you have the right motherboard chipset.Power draw and temper...
|
|
|
We've taken a look at two of the Ryzen 7 processors namely the 1800X and the 1700X. Both processors delivered marvelous performance in multi-threaded benchmarks. It's time to take a look at what can be considered the "lower-end" processor of the Ryzen 7 s...
Good multi-threaded performance, Good price-to-performance ratio, Low Temperature, Cheaper than the 1700X and 1800X, Able to reach 3.9GHz...
Relatively low single-threaded performance, Low performance in 1080p...
It's great for the consumers and the industry as a whole to see AMD back in the CPU game after so long. After their successful launch of the Ryzen 7 1800X, it's refreshing to see competition in the higher-end spectrum of the processor market.Despite being...
|
|
|
AMD is trying to claw back lost market share with its eight-core Ryzen processors, and in the process, the company is generating a tremendous amount of excitement. Most of the enthusiasm stems from competitive pricing and solid performance in content crea...
Unlocked ratio multiplier, Lowcost eight core, 65W TDP, Bundled cooler...
Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models, Lower game performance than Intel processors, Poorly optimized software ecosystem...
The 1700 performs well in heavily threaded workloads, but lags behind Intel's quad cores in most gaming scenarios. However, the Ryzen 7 1700 also offers the lowest entry-level price point for a modern eight-core processor and features enough overclock...
|
|
tbreak.ae Updated: 2017-04-27 02:49:08
|
The AMD Ryzen 1700 is currently AMD's most affordable 8-core Summit Ridge processor of the ZEN line-up. We try out the new chip and find out if it's as good as the faster 1700X and 1800X processors.One of the most interesting facts about the Ryzen 7 1700...
65W TDP, Excellent Price/Performance value...
Some games still need to be optimized...
We honestly have to give it to AMD for developing a 65W processor that can almost keep up with the 95W Ryzen 1700X and 1800X eight-core processors. The fact that all Ryzen processors, including the Ryzen 1700 CPU with the "unlocked" status, is the biggest...
|
|
|
AMD's Ryzen CPU line-up has been one of the most anticipated technology product releases in a long time and yes it has been worth the wait. We were all wondering if Ryzen would stack up to AMD's hype and the collective hope of the community - thankfully...
Solid 8 Core/16 Thread performance, Lower TDP of 65W for cooler operation, Our Sample overclocked to 3.9GHz easily, Suitable for content creation / video editing or render work, New AM4 platform, Very compelling price, Great CPU for a multi-purpose system...
Still slightly slower in some single threaded applications...
Ryzen has been worth the wait. AMD has delivered a solid processor at a disruptive price point. The Ryzen 7 1700 may not have the XFR feature but it's still unlocked and overclocks provided that you have the right motherboard chipset.Power draw and temper...
|
|
|
The Ryzen 7 1700 is the cheapest of AMD's first Zen-based CPUs and also now my favourite, and not just because I'm a financially-focused bread head. For me this is where AMD's octa-core Ryzen 7 CPUs genuinely give Intel a bit of a headache when it comes t...
The Ryzen 7 1700 is really what I was hoping for from the first octa-core Zen-based chips. It's around the same price as Intel's eight-threaded quad-core i7 7700K, if a little cheaper, and runs rings around it from a straight CPU performance point of view...
|
|
klgadgetguy.com Updated: 2017-06-08 02:47:41
|
It has been a tough war for AMD in both the desktop CPU and GPU market, though the company has spent the past few years hitting the sweet spot price tag with its products, they barely reminded the average consumers of its existence. AMD has sent us the re...
• Good price per performance against the Core i7 7700K • Unlock multiplier for overclocking • Impressive performance in multithreaded applications and games • AMD SenseMI technology learns and adapts to computing behaviors • CPU load temperature reasonabl...
Some applications and games can't take advantage of the CPU's 16 threads...
|
|
|
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is hands down my favorite Ryzen model so far, retailing at just RM 1,599.Unlike the Ryzen 7 1700X and 1800X that are 95W models, the 1700 is a 65W model. The key difference it runs at a much lower 3.0Ghz base clock compared to the 3.4...
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is hands-down my favorite processor simply because I'm an overclocker and I can get it to perform as good as the higher-end models without incurring the cost. For those who have the money to spend and want the fastest speed out of the...
|
|
|
COMMENT My faith in the AMD processor range has been reinforced by the impressive new Ryzen series.I've nothing against Intel except their premium pricing — a bit like Telstra, I suppose — but have been using AMD processors in my desktop systems for well...
|
|
|
Casting our minds back five years, before the time AMD rehired the Zen microarchitecture engineer Jim Keller in 2012 (who incidentally had huge influence on AMD's previous successes), today's Ryzen CPU launch seemed almost impossible.Not only had Intel a...
Overall, then, the day has finally arrived that we thought would never come - a competitive CPU from AMD at the high end. There are some teething problems to get over, and don't expect as polished an experience as you would from an Intel Z270 system right...
|
|
|
I recently took a look at AMD's top dog Ryzen 7 1800X 8-core/16-thread CPU, and while it's multi-core performance was dangerously fast, it also costs upwards of $500. AMD also launched two more affordable models, with identical core counts and even the sa...
I thought that the Ryzen 7 1800X was a great CPU, that is why I gave it the second highest award we offer at TweakTown. It's a great CPU that does very well against Intel's HEDT's 8-core CPUs and does so at a remarkably lower price. However, that price, $...
|
|
|
Fundamentally, not much separates the three Ryzen 7s except clock-speeds. The 1700X drops a couple of hundred megahertz, but saves you £130/$100. Meanwhile, the entry-level 1700 sees a 3.0GHz base clock - some way off the top-tier model's 3.6GHz - but off...
There's a range of advice we can offer to any prospective Ryzen owners. First, the more expensive 1800X is only recommended if you want the fastest possible stock processor, no matter what the cost. Highly clocked out of the box, there's not a huge amount...
|
|
|
In this, the ultimate AMD vs Intel comparison, Fierce PC sent me two identical systems – barring the CPU and motherboard of course! The Intel system features an i7-7700K and an Asus Maximus IX Hero – whereas the AMD system features a Ryzen 7 1700 running...
|
|
|
For the past few years, processors made by Intel have been more powerful – and much more popular – than those made by rival AMD. However, AMD’s Ryzen processors have turned that around: they’re powerful CPUs at a tempting price, and an excellent alternati...
|
|
|
Ryzen has been on the market for a little over a week now, and it's already off to an impressive start. While there have been some bugs with memory performance, some of which that are still to be fixed at the time of writing, we've seen that these issues...
Competitive price, 8-Core w/ 16 Threads, New AM4 platform, Very easy to overclock, Can closely match the 1800X while overclocked, Precision Boost and XFR, Excellent performance in rendering (Cinebench), Good gaming performance...
None, Neutral, Memory performance still has a few bugs, but we expect these to be fixed with a BIOS update, Like all 8-core chips, it can get quite warm, so a powerful cooler is recommended, Price is very similar to the more established i7-7700K, “The Ryz...
PricingThe Ryzen 7 1700 comes in at just £332.60, a far cry from the flagship, 1800X which costs £488.99. On Amazon UK. That makes the R7 1700 around the same price at the Intel Core i7-7700K (mostly thanks to recent Intel price cuts).OverviewThe Ryzen hy...
|
|
uk.hardware.info Updated: 2018-03-28 06:51:34
|
In 2017, AMD and Intel once again competed with each other, in a way we hadn't seen in years. Both brands came up with tons of new Core and Ryzen processors. Time to take stock: Which processor should you buy for which purpose? After reading this article...
Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...
|
|
|
In 2017, AMD and Intel once again competed with each other, in a way we hadn't seen in years. Both brands came up with tons of new Core and Ryzen processors. Time to take stock: Which processor should you buy for which purpose? After reading this article...
Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...
|
|
|
The price difference between the 1700 and the flagship 1800X is fairly small now, at £30-40, which means the 1700 is really only worth considering if you plan to overclock it. The Ryzen 7 1700 has a base frequency of just 3GHz and can only boost to 3.7GHz...
Eight cores, Faster than the the Ryzen 7 1800X when overclocked...
Low stock speed, Not as fast in lightly threaded tasks as Intel chips...
Unbeatable value for multi-threaded workloads, especially when it’s overclocked...
|
|
|
The second generation of AMD Ryzen CPUs launched with a mighty bang last month. They propelled the performance of the Ryzen CPUs to new heights, breaking the 4 GHz barrier with ease, and delivering greatly improved performance. Not only that, they're rubb...
For the desktop PC gamer, the higher TDP X models are still the go-to for gaming and general performance though. They're a little faster, and a little more expensive, but you get what you pay for. However, if heat and power are a big concern to you, and t...
|
|
|
The second generation of Ryzen CPUs is here at last! Following on from our launch of the 2700X and the 2600X, the lower TDP non-X parts are here now too! We've already reviewed the 8-core R7 2700 and were impressed with what it had to offer. Of course, to...
I can see the Ryzen 5 2600 and the 2600X fast becoming the most popular chips of the second generation Ryzen launch. They're fast, they're affordable, and they're easy to keep cool and overclock. I mean, if you're just doing a massive amount of rendering...
|
|
|
I'm going to start this article off with a simple number: five. Not only is that the number of months it has taken AMD to effectively turn the x86 processor world on its ear, but that's also the number of distinct model families that they've introduced...
|
|
|
AMD has a lot riding on its new Ryzen processors. After practically ceding the high-end CPU market to Intel for years, the company really needs Ryzen to succeed. So far, reviews have been generally positive, and save for slightly lackluster 1080p gaming...
Sometimes you don't have to be the absolute best to be a winnerIn a nutshell, Ryzen 5's main advantage over Intel's Core i5 range is the higher number of cores and threads it offers while sharing the same price bracket. That's not unlike what AMD offers w...
|
|
|
AMD hadn't just announced a new processor architecture, but the dawning of a new manufacturing process in which the chips would be based on, 14nm which was a first for AMD. Not only was their new 14nm FinFET process to be more energy efficient, but would...
|
|